> They said it was a once in generation vote. Or, put another way, you are trying to bind future voters to a promise you agreed to. An arbitrary, ill defined

> They said it was a once in generation vote. Or, put another way, you are trying to bind future voters to a promise you agreed to. An arbitrary, ill defined promise at that. What are you telling the younger voters you want to disenfranchise? Perhaps a supermajority was always the better solution to big questions that should have strong consensus.