2 ms·
I think that's much better dealt with a greater than 50% majority requirement than with any kind of timing requirement. There's no reason to believe that a tim
by dale_glass 4y ago
I think that's much better dealt with a greater than 50% majority requirement than with any kind of timing requirement.
There's no reason to believe that a time requirement is a good protection against random politicians saying outrageous things. In fact it probably makes things worse because it gives obvious timelines for a campaign, so whenever the possibility opens up it pretty much guarantees all the outrageous politicians coming out of the woodwork.
- mnw21cam 4y agoYeah. The problem with requiring a greater than 50% majority is that politically the side that wants the change to happen will complain that it's unfair.