3 ms·
even if most of it is low quality (Khan Academy, Wikipedia) Aren't you defeating your own argument in one sentence? Or are you saying that those are examples
by tremon 4y ago
even if most of it is low quality
(Khan Academy, Wikipedia)
Aren't you defeating your own argument in one sentence? Or are you saying that those are examples of low-quality information?
- MrBlueIncognito 4y ago> Or are you saying that those are examples of low-quality information? Yes. This[1] poorly-made Khan Academy video from 2008 recorded in 144p would would not compare with something like the Feynman Lectures on Physics[2]. As for Wikipedia, they acknowledge their flaws.[3] 1.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwDJ1wVr7Is&list=PLqwfRVlgGdFCqqzN5kxklreTBOnILQLiq&index=27 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwDJ1wVr7Is&list=PLqwfRVlgGd... 2.https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu 3.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_r...
- aaronwalker 4y agoThose are examples of relatively well curated internet resources compared to a typical blog post or medium article. Khan Academy has allowed students the opportunity that underfunded schools miss—-for instance, the ability to advance their math skills, without the need of an expensive tutor.