3 ms·

Your parent was using those two examples to make a logical point. Not by way of of comparison. You might have got that from the wide political difference betwe

• elicash 4y ago
  It's an absurd example. If you were walking by my apartment building and I called the cops on you, would it be appropriate for me to say "well if you were the KKK, and I mistakenly thought I owned the sidewalk, I'd be right to call the cops!"? Bringing up a violent group like this makes no sense at all. And yes, examples are given specifically as points of comparison.
  • lovemenot 4y ago
    I am pleased to see your rebuttal. Frankly, I initially thought your indignation was disingenuous. Now, I think we have both read that comment differently. >> Would they have done the same thing if animal rights protesters, or the Proud Boys, or whoever came and someone thought they were on Amazon property illegally? I think so. I read it as: take any arbitrary group of people who might organise a protest from any arbitrary political or social position "or whoever". Regardless, Amazon would have reacted the same. There is no implicit comparison to insurrectionists in such a reading.
    • elicash 4y ago
      Maybe it just struck a nerve because I've been watching the Jan 6 hearings with videos of the violent mobs attacking police in my home city, a few blocks from where I used to live. In contrast, people who do this union work are heroes as far as I'm concerned. Using the Proud Boys as an example during a discussion about lawful, non-violent efforts makes no sense at all; this group isn't merely a group with a different political or social position than the union organizers.