3 ms·
I don't think your disagreement with a couple points in the essay really merits a knee-jerk conclusion that the whole thing is untrustworthy. You didn't show a
by civilized 4y ago
I don't think your disagreement with a couple points in the essay really merits a knee-jerk conclusion that the whole thing is untrustworthy.
You didn't show anything the author said was dishonest or egregiously wrong. You just have your own ideas on a couple of particulars.
- fleetwoodsnack 4y agoThis article fails to provide some necessary context that is being brought up elsewhere in the thread. KA, the house whose demise served as an emblem in this article for the demise of Stanford’s social scene: the house associated with the Brock Turner rape. The mile-long lake whose recreational utility was neglected by Stanford administration: unnatural municipal lake whose dam simply stopped operating. The author doesn’t have to be explicitly “dishonest or egregiously wrong” to warrant some skepticism on the part readers.