3 ms·
Not if they prevented parents or someone else from entering who could have saved lives. It would be hard for them to argue they don't have a specific duty but c
by encryptluks2 4y ago
Not if they prevented parents or someone else from entering who could have saved lives. It would be hard for them to argue they don't have a specific duty but can prevent other people from fulfilling that duty.
- kube-system 4y agoThere isn’t much of an argument to be made about that at all. “Specific duty” has an established legal meaning here. It means that the police have already established some agreement to protect an individual beyond what they normally do for the general public. That’s clearly not applicable to this situation.