Git is so much better that it isn't even funny. To this day, I've yet to hear an argument for git's superiority that wasn't predicated on: - The assumption th

Git is so much better that it isn't even funny. To this day, I've yet to hear an argument for git's superiority that wasn't predicated on: - The assumption that hiding your work in a local branch is somehow a general feature instead of being detrimental to communication and optimized for Linux's development model, or - Based on a 2003-era understanding of SVN and its support for merge tracking, branch switching, etc. I keep hearing a lot of enthusiasm but not much to back it up. Do you have a different take than the above?