5 ms·
You want the government to track you everywhere you go? What could possibly go wrong with that?
by mnd999 4y ago
You want the government to track you everywhere you go? What could possibly go wrong with that?
- Ekaros 4y agoIsn't that small price to pay for everyone paying their fair share and not free loading on others?
- mnd999 4y agoFrankly, no.
- function_seven 4y agoWell, it's a price. Definitely not a small one. I'll pay more and subsidize freeloaders rather than increase government tabs on me.
- wbsss4412 4y agoIf that’s the case, car users should be paying _more_. Pedestrian and bike infrastructure is peanuts in comparison to the investment and ongoing maintenance costs that car infrastructure requires.
- Beltalowda 4y agoI genuinely can't tell if you're being serious or just taking the piss. If you're taking the piss: lol, pretty funny. If you're serious: lol, pretty funny.
- corrral 4y agoWear from bikes and pedestrians is too small to be worth metering. You'd spend more on tracking and enforcement than it costs. It's true that automobile use-in-terms-of-road-wear taxes would look very different from what they are now. A compact ICE car's total tax burden would drop to almost nothing. Ditto motorcycles. Truck and large SUV taxes would increase significantly. 18-wheelers would see enormous tax increases (road shipping is effectively heavily subsidized, now).
- sigzero 4y agoNo, no it is not. No thank you.