>So the assertion is, that you can achieve identical computational power to a neuron with a much simpler model. I use the word "Must" as in "highly likely" if

>So the assertion is, that you can achieve identical computational power to a neuron with a much simpler model. I use the word "Must" as in "highly likely" if my words didn't convey the probability then my bad, but I assure you now that my intent is conveying a probability. > There is insufficient evidence to conclude this. There is enough evidence to show it is sufficiently high probability for consideration. >If you said "I believe there might be" or "it's possible that" I would not have taken issue with it, I did say this MULTIPLE times in subsequent responses. I am telling you now that is 100% what I meant. Now that we're clear, we are in agreement. This conversation is over.