3 ms·
> Absolutely untrue The police are under no legal obligation to protect and serve, https://mises.org/power-market/police-have-no-duty-protect-you-federal-court
by tvaughan 4y ago
> Absolutely untrue
The police are under no legal obligation to protect and serve, https://mises.org/power-market/police-have-no-duty-protect-you-federal-court-affirms-yet-again https://mises.org/power-market/police-have-no-duty-protect-y...
- jjulius 4y agoYou - and others - keep missing the part where I said "trained" rather than "legally required".
- colinmhayes 4y agoI'm under no legal obligation to do my job either. Doesn't mean I won't face discipline if I stop working. The job of police is to protect and serve. That's what they're trained to do. Whether or not they can face legal consequences if they refuse isn't really relevant here.
- LocalH 4y agoYour job likely isn't backed by the state's "monopoly on violence", either.
- jeremyjh 4y agoThat means they can't be sued for this, but GP is taking about their training, and departmental policy/procedures. It is their professional responsibility to stop the threat.