So someone who frankly hates git and just uses it to clone a repo someone else made with git, while keeping all their own code in other systems, will be measure

So someone who frankly hates git and just uses it to clone a repo someone else made with git, while keeping all their own code in other systems, will be measured as 'voting for' git. Personally, I think both git and hg are broken in different ways, but either still beats svn. Why do git users (as it seems to me) constantly evangelize their product over all others?