3 ms·
I mean, I'm no rationalism absolutist, but deepfake technology is in essence sophisticated lying/fraud. Kinda hard for me to see how it's not harmful. Sure, I c
by riversflow 4y ago
I mean, I'm no rationalism absolutist, but deepfake technology is in essence sophisticated lying/fraud. Kinda hard for me to see how it's not harmful. Sure, I could see how it could be used creatively, but outside of a few edge cases, deepfakes are a weapons technology. It's easy to use it for bad–
mis/disinformation, smear campaigns–ultimately leading to an erosion of public trust in the information they use to stay informed. I think an informed populace is a good, yeah?
Meanwhile the number of ethical uses is relatively quite small. Maybe there is a novel use of this tech that will actually be useful, but I can't see how being able to easily impersonate someone else will be good. Maybe someone here has some ideas.
- phkahler 4y ago>> I'm no rationalism absolutist, but deepfake technology is in essence sophisticated lying/fraud. Thank you for clarifying that. Even in the entertainment world (resurrecting dead actors) it's still a fake (a.k.a. fraud) just that we don't depend on it in a way with real consequences. Deepfakes are inherently fraud/deception.