3 ms·
> I definitely do. If a part of bitcoin's chain of usage requires enough trust to ask the government to intervene to protect me, why not just trust the governme
by olalonde 4y ago
> I definitely do. If a part of bitcoin's chain of usage requires enough trust to ask the government to intervene to protect me, why not just trust the government?
I am not sure I understand the question, Bitcoin does not require trust or intervention from the government.
Your original comment is objectively incorrect in two different ways. It's not even remotely a surprising event[0] and most importantly, self-custody does not require running a server. Therefore I maintain my suspicion but enjoy your upvotes.
[0] "You can't make this up": used to express great surprise. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/you-couldn-t-make-it-up https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/you-coul...
- jmoak3 4y ago>self-custody does not require running a server. I disagree and have made my case elsewhere. Anymore and I think we'd be going in circles. >You can't make this up": used to express great surprise. I think I used it correctly, but agree to disagree on this as well. Sorry for confusing your suspicions with something more conspiratorial.