3 ms·
I disagree. If the lawyer is trying to call the process into question rather than addressing the facts, it's important to remind the jury of lawyer's questionab
by DangitBobby 4y ago
I disagree. If the lawyer is trying to call the process into question rather than addressing the facts, it's important to remind the jury of lawyer's questionable part of the process as well. Fallacious reasoning shouldn't stand in a courtroom.
- Retric 4y agoPointing out someone is in effect a highly paid actor is addressing the facts. Both the content of what was said and the manor in which they said it should be considered suspect.