3 ms·
Some don't maintain their packages. If you re-install every few months you keep you system up-to-date. If this sounds strange to you, then realize that most LFS
by gabriel 15y ago
Some don't maintain their packages. If you re-install every few months you keep you system up-to-date. If this sounds strange to you, then realize that most LFSers are accustomed to running new builds frequently.
Personally, I tracked file/package relationships with a simple script. Easy to do.
Tracking package dependencies is more difficult, and I usually did this manually with some help with some specialized scripts.
Plus side is you can avoid dependencies you don't like and add functionality where you need it. You can make a developers heaven this way. Usually the only way I do serious Linux development is with an LFS-based system. When I use distros I usually spend a lot of time creating a specialized environment and the time saving in using a distro is sort of nullified.
Bad side is obviously if you want to upgrade a vital dependency you'd have to upgrade all forward dependencies also. Not so difficult if you have it scripted, but errors are hard to handle. Of course, an LFSer would usually know how to install different versions of packages and have them co-exist. However, mostly you just want to keep top-level packages updated, which is easy to do (e.g. Firefox, developer tools).