3 ms·
Why are you being so disingenuous? I have not argued that porn is immoral or should be banned or whatever anywhere. I don't like that pornhub operated for so lo
by colpabar 4y ago
Why are you being so disingenuous? I have not argued that porn is immoral or should be banned or whatever anywhere. I don't like that pornhub operated for so long without requiring any sort of verification, and I think they should be held accountable.
- LatteLazy 4y agoThere are 2 problems you have: 1. You have shown no reason why PornHub, or Porn are special cases 2. You have missed the simple fact that you're playing whack-a-mole and there is fundamentally no difference between Pornhub, Youtube, Facebook, Reddit or HN. If you let people upload without checking it manually, you do it for everything, porn or text or executables, it's all just bits. If you don't, that's fine but kiss goodbye to 99% of content including all of HN. Those are your options. I think too many people look at this and "feel" there should be a better solution. But there isn't. And feeling there should be and demanding one aren't actually ways to get one. Sorry if this is blunt, but this debate has been had and had and had again...
- Chris2048 4y ago> there is fundamentally no difference between Pornhub, Youtube, Facebook, Reddit or HN Some of those host videos, and are therefore capable of hosting cp. If HN is not fundamentally different PH, then cp is not fundamentally different to any offensive test - which I disagree with. > you do it for everything Why? It's all just bits, but there are much greater limits on how many a video-host will store versus a forum. > this debate has been had then state the hidden assumption - why you must treat text the same as video.