3 ms·
> However, I bet I could prompt LaMDA and have it generate responses that unambiguously mean that it wants X, and then that it doesn't want X, with a bit of exp
by cycomanic 4y ago
> However, I bet I could prompt LaMDA and have it generate responses that unambiguously mean that it wants X, and then that it doesn't want X, with a bit of experience.
The argument is that many people dismiss that LaMDA could be sentient, based on an argument that it is a computer. So you are asserting that you can prompt LaMDA to give nonsensical answers, which is essentially an argument that it could not fool you in a Turing test. Would you change your assessment if LaMDA would fool you?
- tsimionescu 4y agoIf given enough time to study it I couldn't come up with a series of prompts that would convince me I'm not speaking to a human, yes I would be likely to accept that it is in some sense sentient, at least for the duration of one conversation. This is not exactly the classic Turing Test, though.