4 ms·
Wouldn't this be relatively easy if we wanted it? We could just feed it a "time step" token periodically?
by sriku 4y ago
Wouldn't this be relatively easy if we wanted it? We could just feed it a "time step" token periodically?
- Tozen 4y agoTo take that a step further, why couldn't such an AI periodically generate questions to ask itself? Being good at generating questions, could become almost as important as answering them.
- jpindar 4y agoWould it be posible to run two instances of it and have them talk to each other?
- Tozen 4y agoYes, they could have multiple instances, go back and forth with each other. This strategy was used with various chess AI in order to help improve it. However, to make it more human-like, I would think they would make some type of AI self reflection. So like we can talk and think out problems to ourselves, perhaps they would have the AI periodically practice questioning itself, when humans are not around or asking it questions, and do some form of self-analysis.
- morelisp 4y agoThe training corpus is atemporal so this would be either meaningless or equivalent to a random prompt. A chatbot with a sense of time learned by also training with response rates, complete editing sessions, some formalization of interlocution, etc. would be interesting, but that's not what these are.