3 ms·

So, according to your logic, a criminal responding to an interrogation with "things we know never happened" would not be sentient? Or let's put it another way:

So, according to your logic, a criminal responding to an interrogation with "things we know never happened" would not be sentient? Or let's put it another way: was there any specific instruction set for the Ai in question that indicated it "had to" only respond based on "things the humans know happened"?

lern_too_spel 4y ago
What part of "incapable" do you have trouble understanding? Since you will now understand my argument, I can't rule out that you are sentient. Since LaMDA is incapable of relating its experiences, I can.
- kelseyfrog 4y ago
  > Since LaMDA is incapable of relating its experiences, I can. Cool, mind having a chat real quick to prove it?
  - lern_too_spel 4y ago
    Have you missed the implied "[rule out that it is sentient]?" What do you want me to prove?