3 ms·
Same logic applies no matter how many people there are. Instituting pervasive checks on everything and distrust by default is not different from failed attempts
by strogonoff 4y ago
Same logic applies no matter how many people there are. Instituting pervasive checks on everything and distrust by default is not different from failed attempts at communism as exemplified by USSR and China.
- nyolfen 4y agoi genuinely cannot comprehend the logic behind this statement. nobody is forcing you to use these systems, so you seem to have some emotional discomfort with other people having the ability to protect themselves. what is your alternative? forced trust, dependence on third party authorities?
- strogonoff 4y ago> nobody is forcing you to use these systems The general sentiment from blockchain enthusiasts I talked with is that conventional system is obsolete and must be superseded by what they’re building ASAP. If you are OK with blockchain and adjacent tech being a niche, then I don’t really have anything to object to (whatever floats your boat and all that). > what is your alternative? forced trust, dependence on third party authorities? No… I sort of spent a while describing it in my original comment.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]