The problem is that people with “concerns” aren’t always acting in good faith when they “just ask questions” about the safety of vaccinations. They make basic m

The problem is that people with “concerns” aren’t always acting in good faith when they “just ask questions” about the safety of vaccinations. They make basic mechanistic errors. Or they falsely claim that some safety steps were skipped during approval. Or they cite observational studies while ignoring much stronger double-blind trials. Or they don’t properly apply statistics. The list goes on and on. When shown contradicting evidence, they don’t change their mind, or trust their mistaken sources less — they go on to the next BS talking point they read on Telegram. If a reasonable, reputable scientist had legitimate concerns with the safety of the approved vaccinations, those concerns would be blown out of proportion by the antivaxx community. That is why there is so much-self censorship in this debate: no actual scientist wants to be responsible for potential illnesses and deaths because their academic concerns have between twisted and deliberately misinterpreted.