3 ms·
I thought by now enough people have framework fatigue that no one bothers with yet another way to develop a website. Is there a reason someone like me should c
by hsn915 4y ago
I thought by now enough people have framework fatigue that no one bothers with yet another way to develop a website.
Is there a reason someone like me should care? Does it improve anything by atleast an order of magnitude?
- nstart 4y agoI think the reason to be interested in this is because it’s deno specific. I’m not up to date with the deno landscape but I believe this is pretty novel for deno.
- eyelidlessness 4y ago> Island based client hydration for maximum interactivity. > Zero runtime overhead: no JS is shipped to the client by default. Translation: the UX most people on HN complaining about JS want. It’s just the interactive parts, none of the treating a web page like it’s an app, but devs familiar with developing sites that way can use it that way without jamming MBs of JS down users’ browsers.
- darepublic 4y agoto me it seems to be promising a more substantial improvement than most frameworks + the deno factor definitely makes it stand out. minimum js needed for interactivity being sent to the client is much better than what we do currently
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]