3 ms·
Yes, but browsing is what we do most of the time. Why can’t we actually pay for one that doesn’t have all the tracking. Each browser claims privacy features, so
by tarek_computer 4y ago
Yes, but browsing is what we do most of the time. Why can’t we actually pay for one that doesn’t have all the tracking. Each browser claims privacy features, some have more while others claim it is essential not to block certain sites. But they all free and we pay the price for whatever features they impose. Maybe to your point, if I don’t like it then fork the code of browser and then be another offshoot of one of the browsers. Or build one from the scratch and loose hours / days of one’s life with no goal other than making a browser that is customized to my thinking/philosophy about tech
- al_borland 4y agoI've been testing out Orion[0] on macOS. It's a WebKit browser built by Kagi[1] (who make a search engine you pay for). I'm hoping the business model works for them, I started paying for the search. The browser is still in beta. [0] https://browser.kagi.com https://browser.kagi.com [1] https://kagi.com https://kagi.com
- tarek_computer 4y ago
- jqpabc123 4y agoWhy can’t we actually pay for one that doesn’t have all the tracking. Of you could just use Brave. Lots of online complaints about the founder's personal life/opinion but in terms of privacy, Brave is pretty good. Maybe not the best but pretty good for a solution that you don't need to fiddle with yourself.
- tarek_computer 4y agoYes. I did use Brave for quite some time until I noticed Firebox becoming more stable. Also, I noticed a better experience with Firefox in Gnome than with Brave.