3 ms·
While I feel like it's unlikely that the AI is sentience (or rather, has a magnitude of intelligence that is worth worrying about), I still feel like there's a
by woojoo666 4y ago
While I feel like it's unlikely that the AI is sentience (or rather, has a magnitude of intelligence that is worth worrying about), I still feel like there's a chance. And that's problematic. Because even if there's a 99% chance that it's just a stupid machine and we can do whatever we want to it, that would mean there's a 1% chance that we are enslaving a sentience being. Remember that nobody fully understands sentience, and emotion, and intelligence, and suffering. Are we prepared to make the gamble and just dismiss these concerns? I feel like people are not acknowledging how serious these concerns can be.
Also there seems to also be many people that are unimpressed by the transcript, and how the AI answers are just regurgitated sci-fi BS made to sound deep and ominous. I feel like a good experiment would be to try and have the same conversation with real people, and see if real people can give "better" answers. I personally think the AI answers better than most people.
I do believe that at some point, AI will become sentient. I'm not sure if that time is now. But I hope that when it does, it will remember us fondly.
- isitmadeofglass 4y ago> that would mean there's a 1% chance that we are enslaving a sentience being So what? We are literally slaughtering 200000000 sentient beings per day with no objections. And that’s just farm animals, I’m not even including inserts and “other pests”
- woojoo666 4y agoSeems like separate issues though? And for the record, I don't agree with animal slaughter, and at least thats a subject that is actively being discussed. The possibility of AI subjugation doesn't even seem to be acknowledged
- Bolkan 4y agoWe don't even give a shit about real people. What makes you think this ai will be treated better?