6 ms·
What's in a name? Freshmeat is now Freecode
- callahad 15y agoHuh. The "free(code)" wordmark actually feels rather nice. It's imperative. Free your code! In marked contrast, "freecode" just feels... cheap.
- thwarted 15y agoI miss one their early logos, the one with the image of a girl getting a tattoo. Took me forever to realize what it was with the way it broken up and obscured with the letters.
- sgt 15y agoI think they should have done this namechange years ago. Maybe 10 years ago when it started fading. And also, they should shift their focus on helping Linux users find software that is useful to them, i.e. software that is easily installable on the most popular distributions. If you go to Freshmeat/Freecode now, and look at the front page, you'll find obscure libraries, with a "Download" link that takes you to the tarballs. In my opinion, they should be doing that as well, but they should be doing more than that.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- roschdal 15y agoThis is what happens when you have a parent company. The freshmeat brand was good enough, IMHO.
- nona 15y agoI liked the original Freshmeat too. It feels a bit too generic now.
- SkyMarshal 15y agoFor hackers maybe, but apparently their target market is larger. "...while numerous sales teams have struggled to position the freshmeat brand appropriately among potential sponsors in the United States. Outside of our very own small niche of the Web, people have all sorts of associations with the name freshmeat, most of which have nothing to do with a free, open source software directory." Eg, no more accidentally mistaking the brand for butcher shops or child porn.
- viraptor 15y agoSometimes it's a good idea. If I had a penny for every time I go to ripe org instead of net... (NSFW warning)
- sanswork 15y agoI haven't thought of Freshmeat in probably 8 years. Amazing to see that they are still around. Does anyone here actually actively use them anymore? If so how? Back in the day I would use it to watch for new releases of different types of software to try out and experiment with.
- wazoox 15y agoFrom time to time when I'm looking for an application for some particular task, I search freshmeat. The last time I checked it I was looking for an Ascii drawing tool, and found several such good tools.
- ltamake 15y agoI use them for occasional code surfing.
- asto 15y agoI'm only reminded of their existence when I'm surfing slashdot
- georgemcbay 15y agoSame here. And to go one level deeper, I'm only reminded of Slashdot's existence when someone mentions them on Hacker News or reddit.
- sanswork 15y agoTo think about how much time I use to spend on slashdot to go to seeing one of my developers reading it the other month and actually saying "You're who keeps slashdot around?!". It's a weird feeling.
- SageRaven 15y agoI visit once a week to view the projects that have been updated over the week. Keeps me aware of new projects and up to date on the status of stuff that I use every day but might not otherwise know how its progressing. Personally, I'm kinda bummed about the the change of name.
- tobylane 15y agoWould be a much better name if Freenode didn't exist.
- moe 15y agoFreshmeat used to be great in the days of altavista and sourceforge. In the age of google and github it has become largely irrelevant.
- viraptor 15y agoActually there's still good amount of metadata about a project which github doesn't provide. But http://www.ohloh.net/ http://www.ohloh.net/ captured that part pretty well. Freshmeat was left in the not needed category.
- powertower 15y agoSimilar move was "ColdStorage" to "SourceForge".
- supar 15y agoFreshmeat used to be a milestone of opensource software for a long time. It offered a good service for developers, including APIs, to publish your software and have it categorized. You hit the frontpage for every version, which would be a very nice publicity boost even for scarcely known applications. If you search through Ubuntu/Debian's repository you can still find a lot of helpers to "release" on freshmeat, which should give you an idea of how much freshmeat was entrenched in FOSS. As an user, freshmeat was great. You could search by category, release type, language, environment, etc. Pretty much everything that was afterwards integrated in the sourceforge "trove" was pioneered by freshmeat. It was my go-to source for software just after an "apt search". Yeah, the look was funky, but who cares? Most of the software was so technical that many simply didn't care. Google would (and still does) return too much crap for pretty much any query regarding software, whereas freshmeat offered immediate insight though filtering, categorization and project statistics. I've found so many gems on freshmeat that I would have never have found in Google (because of the sheer amount of results - mine being always one of the last ones), stackoverflow (field is too narrow) or github (which basically restricts to software developed with git, and is often incomplete). They decided to redesign it a couple of years ago, and while they were at it they decided to throw away anything that was still good about it: search. Of course, the new trend was tag clouds, so you can guess, now projects are now categorized by tags. As such, it's now pretty much impossible to guess the correct tag/tags for a project. It's either a tag with a different spelling or a different word altogether. The tagging process is also too liberal: in the old freshmeat, you were encouraged to categorize your software in several hierarchical groups. As such, many projects would have a proper "programming language" category filled it, a proper "operating environment" (like command line, X11), etc. Searching was a breeze just because you were guided during the categorization. Now it's basically the same as a google search: you either have too many results, or zero. Giving the programmers just a "tags" field to fill it has resulted in the archive having absolutely no consistency. It's a shame, really, because there's a lot of niche software (visualization, scientific tools operating of weird data, a lot of old stuff) that I can still only find on freshmeat. I've been thinking myself of re-implementing the old site simply as a rip-off just to have this archive back. It's sad that all they would think of now is change the name, because that's irrelevant for the highly technical users which used to publish/search on freshmeat.
- KingOfB 15y agoAnyone remember the original freshmeat logo? For the life of me I couldn't find it, but it was basically a softcore-skin as the background for the freshmeat text. I looked at the internet archive, and the older sites had a broken link for the logo. http://web.archive.org/web/200011091300/http://freshmeat.net/ http://web.archive.org/web/200011091300/http://freshmeat.net... Anyways, seems funny to see them innocently tip toeing around this 'brand problem' they're having without acknowledging they basically had a softcore-porn logo for their first year or so.
- X-Istence 15y agoThe logo doesn't load, unfortunately. Do you have a screenshot or mirror?
- rachelbythebay 15y agoI kept a few screenshots from the old days. Check out this one from September 28, 1998 (complete with vintage Netscape browser action around it)... http://imgur.com/dOXe8 http://imgur.com/dOXe8 Edit: it has the logo in question. I thought this was a person who was crowd-surfing. Yeesh.
- jjanzer 15y agoI sent an email to the freshmeat team a really long time ago (around 2001?) asking them what the image was in the background of it. If I remember correctly, they said it was an image at Lollapalooza. Unfortunately I don't have the original email.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- sixtofour 15y agofreecode makes me think of freeware/shareware sites, i.e. there's a fair amount of dodgyness implied.
- vineet 15y agoGlad to see them trying to reinvigorate the site. Hopefully they will add some cool ideas to support the OSS community.
- teyc 15y agoThe original domain would be worth $$$ to XXXers, considering its page rank.
- jeswin 15y agoExcessive monetization killed it. Users aren't willing to look at distracting layouts anymore.