3 ms·
I came here to say exactly the same thing. Development always begets more development. The rural wilderness that I grew up in is completely unrecognizable toda
by EB66 4y ago
I came here to say exactly the same thing. Development always begets more development.
The rural wilderness that I grew up in is completely unrecognizable today. Acres and acres of essentially untouched forest now replaced with human housing. Creeks have dried up and animal life is a shadow of what it used to be. We used to have otters, beavers, deer, and more but they're long gone now. That transformation started with mundane uncontroversial things like gravel roads and basic utilities. But it grew to encompass much more as more people moved in.
If you accept that the diversity and abundance of plant and non-human animal life has instrinic value then it's awfully easy to say that blocking further human development in wild areas is the "right" thing to do.
- strogonoff 4y agoHumans historically preferred to live in standalone houses because it was the only way to achieve relative comfort, and of course building bigger mansions on more land (populating them with servants to take care of it all) signaled wealth. Now we have the technology to build to live densely and in comfort, and we also see what a disaster we generally are to the environment. I wish we slowly started to consider it ethically not OK to want to move to untouched areas and demand them to be developed and infrastructure erected.