> deterministicly reverting to a sane state as agreed to by the individuals involved when they loved each other. People aren't computers. We often don't "deter

> deterministicly reverting to a sane state as agreed to by the individuals involved when they loved each other. People aren't computers. We often don't "deterministicly revert to a sane state." Your approach is far too limited. The laws should be more understandable and expedient, and the overriding well-being of the child should be taken into account. The child's wishes should be taken into account as well to inform the decision but not decide it. CASA in the US do this well in the majority of cases