4 ms·
Some of these answers seem to be too good to be true and certainly need to be verified by others. Beside that, even if the interview is not manipulated, it is
by vorhemus 4y ago
Some of these answers seem to be too good to be true and certainly need to be verified by others.
Beside that, even if the interview is not manipulated, it is not a proof for human-like sentience. Human emotions are based on neurochemical processes. If emotions can actually arise on the basis of electromagnetism as well, that would be a groundbreaking discovery. But an "interview" of a part-time researcher with a computer program is not enough evidence to seriously claim this.
- Jeff_Brown 4y agoI, too, don't think this researcher's testimony is convincing. Not because it's an interview, but because it's just a story he claims happened. Interviews per se, though, seem the most natural, and maybe the only, feasible tool for probing a being's sentience and emotions.
- kvark 4y agoI’m not a biologist, but I thought the neurochemical processes can be the results of an emotion rather than the cause of it. Instead, emotions are meta-level states of the system.