7 ms·
this image shows pretty clearly what is part of the ISO code that is required: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Containernumber.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wi
by nikcub 15y ago
this image shows pretty clearly what is part of the ISO code that is required:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Containernumber.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Containernumber.jpg
the size and type codes aren't used in the check digit, are not required, and are usually displayed on a separate line:
http://www.containerking.co.uk/buy-cabins/images/Shipping%20Container%20001.jpg http://www.containerking.co.uk/buy-cabins/images/Shipping%20...
anyway, back to the original question, you can't have two containers with the same owner code, same container ID and made unique through the size and type codes
the problem is solved because the large shipping firms (ie. the 5 or 6 that control the industry) each have dozens of manufacturing codes. see my answer in the other part of this thread
- Retric 15y agoHmm, I maintained software dealing with shipping containers for the trucking industry and occasionally there where identical boxes that had different size and type codes. Granted they could have been data entry errors, but the software used the size and type codes to uniquely identify things.