3 ms·
The study doesn’t seem to account for location, as far as I can see. Could it be that people who live by the sea eat more fish, but also get way more Sun at the
by christophilus 4y ago
The study doesn’t seem to account for location, as far as I can see. Could it be that people who live by the sea eat more fish, but also get way more Sun at the beach, etc?
The report specifically mentioned it didn’t control for Sun exposure.
- throwaway742 4y agoThis was my first thought. Anecdotally when I lived near the beach I ate a lot more fish due to the availability of fresh seafood.
- pjscott 4y agoIt's weird how there's a whole thriving genre of studies that look at things with incredibly complicated causal graphs, maybe control for a random smattering of confounding variables, find a correlation between some variables X and Y, and then declare victory -- even though what they found is seldom an actual causal relationship between X and Y, both in theory and in practice [1]. The researchers here at least had the honesty to be forthright about this, but given the limitations of this kind of study I'm not sure I see the point in even doing them. [1] https://www.gwern.net/Causality https://www.gwern.net/Causality
- throwaway742 4y ago