3 ms·
That means people with cheaper commutes get paid less than people with more expensive commutes. Why would you do that? You’re effectively rewarding people for l
by esoterica 4y ago
That means people with cheaper commutes get paid less than people with more expensive commutes. Why would you do that? You’re effectively rewarding people for living further from work and driving less fuel efficient vehicles, which both makes no business sense and is terrible for the environment.
- dijit 4y agoI think the business doesn't really care where you live. I have made decisions to live close to my offices, not just for commute but because I consider myself responsible to go in when things break and spending 1.5hrs commuting won't do that. When I priced it up when I lived in London it came out to be about the same cost to live closer to the office than to commute even with public transport (which is not horrendously expensive) -- assuming I paid myself what my boss would pay me for my time commuting.
- toxik 4y ago> I think the business doesn't really care where you live. I know Palantir at least have explicit bonuses for living within some distance of the office. It can’t be that uncommon.
- jen20 4y ago> get paid less than people with more expensive commutes Not if it is treated as expense reimbursement instead of salary.