> How “unique” is your tool’s output? Output should look as similar to other common utilities as possible, to reduce the learning curve. Keep it boring. I actu

> How “unique” is your tool’s output? Output should look as similar to other common utilities as possible, to reduce the learning curve. Keep it boring. I actually disagree with this. When skimming through long logs looking for errors I find it really useful that output from different tools look different at a glance. It helps me narrow down into where I'm looking for.