I need time to digest your point, but one note—participants certifying acquiescence to the system still involves trust: as in, you agree to the rules of this mi

I need time to digest your point, but one note—participants certifying acquiescence to the system still involves trust: as in, you agree to the rules of this mini-game, but I trust that you actually follow them. I suspect that such default meta-trust is sort of important, like presumption of innocence; and if there are people who violate it, then we should throw more resources at treating the underlying causes rather than eliminating symptoms. So far blockchain-based trustless tech to me seems instrumental at treating the symptom only (and I can see how it detracts resources from treating the cause), thus I am wary of it.