4 ms·
wasn't this debunked in the previous article on the same subject? http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2849716 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2849716
by weego 15y ago
wasn't this debunked in the previous article on the same subject? http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2849716 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2849716
- nknight 15y agoWhere do you see a "debunking" there? I sure don't. Just a downplaying of the risks of the previous type of attack. This is a new, MUCH worse attack from a different researcher -- one with significant existing credibility, I might add.