3 ms·
Excuse me for sounding harsh, but I don't find this "aesthetically pleasing". Quite the opposite, it looks very, very badly designed. The number of different a
by rickmb 15y ago
Excuse me for sounding harsh, but I don't find this "aesthetically pleasing".
Quite the opposite, it looks very, very badly designed. The number of different and seemingly totally randomly used fonts alone give me a headache.
- rndmize 15y agoThe design seems to be a modified version of King Size, which is a popular theme on themeforest - http://themeforest.net/item/king-size-fullscreen-background-wordpress-theme/166299 http://themeforest.net/item/king-size-fullscreen-background-... Its actually a good template (a friend of mine uses it for his photography) but I don't think it adapts well for social networking.
- jamesbritt 15y agoI'm guessing the idea of the theme is to show off the images created by the site owner, so it's well-suited for a photographer's site, but the images coming up on Swupa are borderline kitsch. A few I've seen are a breath away from Thomas Kinkade. Worse, they tell me nothing about the site or why I'd want to use it. The effect is puzzlement. I'm wondering what the research or testing process was that lead to this design. Or are we now taking part in the research and testing?
- smacktoward 15y agoWow. Good catch. When the main element of an app's pitch is that it looks great, it removes a lot of the cool factor to find out that the look was achieved by dropping in a canned theme.