11 ms·
Maybe you can provide some detail for this counter view? Otherwise it’s just confusing what to believe.
by yunohn 4y ago
Maybe you can provide some detail for this counter view? Otherwise it’s just confusing what to believe.
- unmole 4y agoLet's see: - He discounts the (financial) value of education - Deliberately muddles the definition of an asset and a liability - Suggests commiting tax fraud and participating in insider trading - Fails to offer any actually good investment advice
- yunohn 4y agoThanks for the clarification! I will steer clear of this book then.
- foobarbaz33 4y agoYou might want to take everything with a grain of salt. The book. And the criticism of the book.
- mbrodersen 4y agoThe negative reviewer clearly didn’t get the book or for some reason dislike the author. The counter examples are simply false.
- joemazerino 4y agoThe entire premise of Rich Dad, Poor Dad is to move from the ES (Employment, Service) side of his ESBI equation to BI (Business, Investment). This is sound financial advice. You're also confusing tax deferral with tax fraud. Nothing he wrote is illegal.
- mbrodersen 4y agoYep agree. The negative reviewer clearly didn’t get it.
- mbrodersen 4y agoHave you even read the book? It sounds as if you either didn’t read it or simply didn’t get it.
- unmole 4y agoWhich specific point in my comment do you take issue with?
- mbrodersen 4y agoAll of them. I get that you don’t like the author. OK that’s fine. But every single counter argument you make is false.