3 ms·
Not tautological, I'd say. It is entirely reasonable to say, about a field, that its deepest mysteries have been elucidated centuries ago. One might be mistaken
by FabHK 4y ago
Not tautological, I'd say. It is entirely reasonable to say, about a field, that its deepest mysteries have been elucidated centuries ago. One might be mistaken about that, sure. But it is a sensible and non-tautological statement to make.
(Having said that, the article struck me as fairly vacuous.)
- JadeNB 4y ago> It is entirely reasonable to say, about a field, that its deepest mysteries have been elucidated centuries ago. I can imagine this being true of a field that is no longer studied, although I can't think of any good example—the only unsatisfactory one that occurred to me is penmanship, but (a) that's not exactly a scientific discipline and (b) there are probably still people out there making strides in penmanship—but I find it hard to believe of any living discipline. In fact, I would argue that, if it is true of a discipline that its deepest mysteries were discovered in the past, then that discipline is effectively dead.