3 ms·
Sure, if you think platforms where elite influence and popular opinions are "free speech", be my guest. Really though, you'd probably change more actual minds
by ShamelessC 4y ago
Sure, if you think platforms where elite influence and popular opinions are "free speech", be my guest.
Really though, you'd probably change more actual minds (rather than just finding others who agree with your opinions already) on a literal soapbox.
I do agree that these platforms should have (mostly) been regulated out of existence long before the term "cancelled" was popular.
- samstave 4y agoThe fact that you and the other person above are not commenting on the insane (literally) complex and nuanced basis of corruption through the decades speak to your arogance of superiority... Have you been following politics since the 80s? I have. I dont give a shit what you may say about the current situation, due to the fact that I doubt highly you have tracked politicians through decades. Let me name two, just for course, actually three... Dick Cheney. John McCain. John Kerry. What do all of these folks have in common from the mid seventies through the mid nineties... And we wont talk about their personal corruptions... but what ties all three of these scumbags together through the ages? (let me give you a couple hints... BCCI and the term Khashoggi (or keating) -- Not the dismembered journalist... his older relative)
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- samstave 4y agoI have zero interest in "changing minds" <-- If youre aware of a topic, why should I inform you? If you're not aware, and your only argument is one such as yours, Why would I bother? --- Its your parents' minds that were already lost if you are raised in ignorance... so already two generations behind in your education.