3 ms·
I'd prefer a fourth (unrealistic) option where we go to legislative war against house ownership by any entity that isn't going to live there. Land area is a fin
by causality0 4y ago
I'd prefer a fourth (unrealistic) option where we go to legislative war against house ownership by any entity that isn't going to live there. Land area is a finite natural resource and owning more than you can use is as perverse as selling off acres of the ocean or cubic miles of the atmosphere.
- Guest42 4y agoI think there should be a tax structure that disincentivizes the behavior.
- foogazi 4y ago> I'd prefer a fourth (unrealistic) option no need to be unrealistic - there’s plenty of cheap land (at least in the US) - there’s people that live in Alaska or North Dakota or upstate NY (or whatever inhospitable climate you can choose) We don’t need more rules