3 ms·
> Schultz has said in the past Starbucks didn’t need unions... Of course not. Unions aren't for the corporation, they're for the masses being screwed by the c
by imchillyb 4y ago
> Schultz has said in the past Starbucks didn’t need unions...
Of course not. Unions aren't for the corporation, they're for the masses being screwed by the corporations.