3 ms·
The implication of zero knowledge proofs is that no private data need be shared. The “zk-something” you and Molly both brush over translates literally to “verif
by hGkXBvR 4y ago
The implication of zero knowledge proofs is that no private data need be shared. The “zk-something” you and Molly both brush over translates literally to “verifying knowledge without any private information having to be shared or checked.”
- Jasper_ 4y agoI'd like to verify knowledge about your private password, without it being shared. Sounds good? OK, my first question: does it start with an "a"? No? What about a "b"? How can you verify something about someone's criminal background that doesn't ultimately share the information?
- dmitriid 4y agoIs that zk thing required by the soulbound tokens? Ah. No. All Vitalik is saying is that you could use it, but it's not a requirement. So it's on the person/organization who's attaching that irrevocable token to not expose that information. So yes. He is brushing this issue aside, and so do you.