3 ms·

Someone should sue them in Texas. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/09/texas-bans-online-censorship-with-law-similar-to-one-already-blocked-in-florida/

Someone should sue them in Texas. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/09/texas-bans-online-censorship-with-law-similar-to-one-already-blocked-in-florida/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/09/texas-bans-onlin...

ceejayoz 4y ago
A judge correctly put that on ice, and even this SCOTUS should have no trouble finalizing the “nope”.
- pyuser583 4y ago
  I thought they already did?
  - ceejayoz 4y ago
    Temporarily. The district court stayed it, the Fifth Circuit (which has been on a nutty tear lately) reinstated it, and SCOTUS put the district court's stay back in place. It'll wind up at SCOTUS again at some point.
Imnimo 4y ago
> This chapter applies only to a social media platform that functionally has more than 50 million active users in the United States in a calendar month. The law is sculpted to not apply to things like Truth Social.
- manquer 4y ago
  While there well be political motive behind that clause, it is still inherently sound to have a lower limit. We wouldmy want say hackernews to be regulated the same way as twitter /Facebook after all.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]