3 ms·
Ah, the never-ending quest to define platform features as anti-competitive in order to make Apple worse.
by ubermonkey 4y ago
Ah, the never-ending quest to define platform features as anti-competitive in order to make Apple worse.
- timmg 4y agoIt's not that Apple ships a browser engine that is the problem. It's that they don't allow you to publish apps that use a different browser engine. Big difference.
- ubermonkey 4y agoI still don't see the problem. Apple is a minority player in this market. Android presumably allows whatever you want, right? If you want the customized experience, use that.
- timmg 4y ago> Apple is a minority player in this market. In the phone market? Maybe by units. Certainly not by revenue. Either way, they have a monopoly on "iPhone apps" and their distribution. You can argue whether that's a market in itself. But lawyers and regulators can make an argument too.
- ubermonkey 4y agoRevenue does not determine market control. Market share does. They are DEFINITELY a minority player vs. Android in terms of handsets in use. It’s not close. Closed platforms have always been a thing. Mostly, they’ve been game consoles. It is hard to understand how Apple should be forced to do anything on antitrust or monopoly grounds, though, based how we have traditionally understood anticompetitive practices.