5 ms·

It only works in places where the institutions are functional, which is something that you are taking from granted. But forget kickstarter. We are talking abou

It only works in places where the institutions are functional, which is something that you are taking from granted. But forget kickstarter. We are talking about identity. Tell me how you could implement, e.g, a twitter-like application where no single entity can kick you out. Assume that the data does not need to live in a blockchain, and each user's data is portable between different servers. The only thing a (willing) server needs to have is a way to authenticate your identity. How would you do that without blockchain?

ookdatnog 4y ago
> It only works in places where the institutions are functional, which is something that you are taking from granted. I want to stick with the Kickstarter example a bit longer, as "banking the unbanked" is to me one of the few claims of potential crypto applications that I care about. Blockchain technology is at this point well over a decade old, yet we can still only talk about its benefits in hypotheticals. You claim that a decentralized, crypto-based alternative to Kickstarter would be valuable in those places where institutions are not functional. This seems like something that could be tested today, as opposed to in some nebulous future. So where are all these applications that financially emancipate the proverbial Somalian farmer? I haven't really seen any concrete, significant success stories, much less any that justify the fossil fuels we're burning to maintain these systems. I suspect this has to do with the strong correlation between corruption in general (which would drive one to adopt crypto alternatives) and poor or nonexistant education (which is needed for the tech literacy to use crypto and not be scammed at every turn). I don't know how to solve that problem. > But forget kickstarter[...] I don't know how to solve that problem without blockchain; I also don't know how to solve it with blockchain.
- rglullis 4y ago
  > So where are all these applications that financially emancipate the proverbial Somalian farmer? https://trustlines.network https://trustlines.network > I also don't know how to solve it with blockchain. https://mastodon.communick.com/@raphael/106825093961591719 https://mastodon.communick.com/@raphael/106825093961591719
  - ookdatnog 4y ago
    > https://trustlines.network https://trustlines.network I'm aware that there are several projects that aim to "bank the unbanked". The existence of projects that claim to solve an issue does not prove that the issue is solved or even addressed. I don't see any numbers or even anecdotes on how effective these projects are at achieving their goals. How many formerly unbanked are now banked thanks to blockchain? And I don't mean that theoretically, as in, "any Somalian farmer could in theory access banking services through the blockchain right now", I mean "how many people who had no access to trustworthy financial institutions in the past, are now actively using blockchain-based alternatives for financial services?"
    - rglullis 4y ago
      > "how many people who had no access to trustworthy financial institutions in the past, are now actively using blockchain-based alternatives for financial services?" This is the falling for the same all-or-nothing trap that I pointed out in the very first comment. We are never going to go from "unbanked" to "banked exclusively thanks to the blockchain". What is going to happen (and is happening) is that these projects will bring "people who don't have access to service X" to "blockchain project that creates an alternative to service X". Examples: - People in countries with strong capital controls can now participate in a global economy through blockchain transactions. - People living in countries with poor monetary policies and weak currencies can protect some of their wealth by buying stabletokens backed by stronger currency. - Communities without access to money markets can now issue their own local currencies and create their own credit cooperatives. - Sex workers and "sin businesses" who are denied access to payment processors (no matter if political or economic reasons) can use web3 to not only accept payments, but also as a way to distribute their content without intermediaries. In all of the examples above, it might happen that the situation in the "traditional" system changes and the groups start getting access. But until they don't have it, it's nice to know that they have an alternative.
      - giantrobot 4y ago
        Your examples are all incomplete. They all need "until people with badges and guns shut them down" or "until they need to deal with off-chain assets that require trusted reliable oracles". It is ludicrous in the extreme to assume that some blockchain transaction can and will remain anonymous and outside the enforcement of laws. A country with repressive or non-functional capital/monetary controls will just jail people using cryptocurrencies unless they turn over their wallets. They can also use an accusation of having a wallet as pretext for indefinite detainment or punishment. Such countries aren't likely to have functional governments or even free access to the Internet. Even TV and radio are tightly controlled in such places.

ookdatnog 4y ago

> It only works in places where the institutions are functional, which is something that you are taking from granted. I want to stick with the Kickstarter example a bit longer, as "banking the unbanked" is to me one of the few claims of potential crypto applications that I care about. Blockchain technology is at this point well over a decade old, yet we can still only talk about its benefits in hypotheticals. You claim that a decentralized, crypto-based alternative to Kickstarter would be valuable in those places where institutions are not functional. This seems like something that could be tested today, as opposed to in some nebulous future. So where are all these applications that financially emancipate the proverbial Somalian farmer? I haven't really seen any concrete, significant success stories, much less any that justify the fossil fuels we're burning to maintain these systems. I suspect this has to do with the strong correlation between corruption in general (which would drive one to adopt crypto alternatives) and poor or nonexistant education (which is needed for the tech literacy to use crypto and not be scammed at every turn). I don't know how to solve that problem. > But forget kickstarter[...] I don't know how to solve that problem without blockchain; I also don't know how to solve it with blockchain.

rglullis 4y ago
> So where are all these applications that financially emancipate the proverbial Somalian farmer? https://trustlines.network https://trustlines.network > I also don't know how to solve it with blockchain. https://mastodon.communick.com/@raphael/106825093961591719 https://mastodon.communick.com/@raphael/106825093961591719
- ookdatnog 4y ago
  > https://trustlines.network https://trustlines.network I'm aware that there are several projects that aim to "bank the unbanked". The existence of projects that claim to solve an issue does not prove that the issue is solved or even addressed. I don't see any numbers or even anecdotes on how effective these projects are at achieving their goals. How many formerly unbanked are now banked thanks to blockchain? And I don't mean that theoretically, as in, "any Somalian farmer could in theory access banking services through the blockchain right now", I mean "how many people who had no access to trustworthy financial institutions in the past, are now actively using blockchain-based alternatives for financial services?"
  - rglullis 4y ago
    > "how many people who had no access to trustworthy financial institutions in the past, are now actively using blockchain-based alternatives for financial services?" This is the falling for the same all-or-nothing trap that I pointed out in the very first comment. We are never going to go from "unbanked" to "banked exclusively thanks to the blockchain". What is going to happen (and is happening) is that these projects will bring "people who don't have access to service X" to "blockchain project that creates an alternative to service X". Examples: - People in countries with strong capital controls can now participate in a global economy through blockchain transactions. - People living in countries with poor monetary policies and weak currencies can protect some of their wealth by buying stabletokens backed by stronger currency. - Communities without access to money markets can now issue their own local currencies and create their own credit cooperatives. - Sex workers and "sin businesses" who are denied access to payment processors (no matter if political or economic reasons) can use web3 to not only accept payments, but also as a way to distribute their content without intermediaries. In all of the examples above, it might happen that the situation in the "traditional" system changes and the groups start getting access. But until they don't have it, it's nice to know that they have an alternative.
    - giantrobot 4y ago
      Your examples are all incomplete. They all need "until people with badges and guns shut them down" or "until they need to deal with off-chain assets that require trusted reliable oracles". It is ludicrous in the extreme to assume that some blockchain transaction can and will remain anonymous and outside the enforcement of laws. A country with repressive or non-functional capital/monetary controls will just jail people using cryptocurrencies unless they turn over their wallets. They can also use an accusation of having a wallet as pretext for indefinite detainment or punishment. Such countries aren't likely to have functional governments or even free access to the Internet. Even TV and radio are tightly controlled in such places.