4 ms·
I don’t think it’s fair to say I’m not aware of the downsides. Yes my own experience is universally in a very aggressive rate environment that could impact my p
by kevin_nisbet 4y ago
I don’t think it’s fair to say I’m not aware of the downsides. Yes my own experience is universally in a very aggressive rate environment that could impact my perspective. But I’m also aware that the majority of the time variable rates end up ahead of fixed rates.
The term mortgages to me make it a bit closer to variable rates. The rate gets updated every few years. Banks themselves to fund the mortgages don’t get 25 year loans. So as an institution they need to set rates based on risk so they don’t lose money. This risk increases the further you project into the future. So all other things being equal you are not paying a premium to insure against that risk.
I’m not commenting on the financial institutions as a whole, or other factors that may lead to higher or lower rates. I’m under the impression that rates are a higher in the us for the 25 year mortgages when calculated off of the overnight rates from the central banks. But I don’t have any data handy to back up the impression for I could be wrong.
I suppose having this be an option for the consumer is probably the best option. But for most consumers insuring against rate increases will be quite costly.
- happyopossum 4y ago> But for most consumers insuring against rate increases will be quite costly. I’m not sure how you can make an argument that long and specific while completely ignoring the evidence to the south of you that contradicts it.