3 ms·
I'm not sure what your point is. I'm not advocating for killing anyone. I don't think you are arguing in good faith here.
by rowanG077 4y ago
I'm not sure what your point is. I'm not advocating for killing anyone. I don't think you are arguing in good faith here.
- elif 4y agoyou referenced helen keller's non-intervention in an instance of infant mortality as evidence that she supported eugenics. It is that erroneous conflation that introduced euthanasia for discussion. (also i would say that technically intentional non-intervention is not exactly killing, so thats not even what i was implying) I provided evidence that keller, contrarily, saw value in genetic defects. If you have another reason for believing that helen keller was a supporter of eugenics, you have failed to provide it.
- elif 4y agoSorry if i hit a nerve, but obviously if i wasn't "arguing in good faith" why would i have so painstakenly avoided mentioning hitler for like 10 comments? conversely, everything i've said has been a direct analysis of what you've said.