3 ms·
Sure, I'm willing to accept that the X.509 is inherently complicated and there's not much OpenSSL could do to simplify it. But that seems like a good reason not
by AdamH12113 4y ago
Sure, I'm willing to accept that the X.509 is inherently complicated and there's not much OpenSSL could do to simplify it. But that seems like a good reason not to add support for 44 other major operations to the software...
- Beltalowda 4y agoTLS is more than just x509. If you want a tool that "just generates certificates" then it's easy, but if you want an advanced management tool that can do all sorts of things then you will end up with something complex because TLS is complex with a lot of different parts. And yeah, the openssl tool could be designed a lot better, but much of this is a matter of UX and managing complexity, not so much reducing it.
- a2800276 4y agoWhy not? It's a collection of 44 tooks each doing one thing well :)