3 ms·
How do we define being "the best at technology"? In software there are some types of tasks that truly benefit from any additional hour worked, but plenty of oth
by macNchz 4y ago
How do we define being "the best at technology"? In software there are some types of tasks that truly benefit from any additional hour worked, but plenty of others for which that is actively counterproductive.
I'd say I've done some of the worst work of my career during the weeks of deepest crunch time. Many of the people I've known closely who've worked like that long term have had stress-induced medical problems.
It's also interesting to point to Olympians here...elite athletes follow carefully planned training programs to balance training and rest to avoid overtraining, and while the best of the best can work up to massive training loads, there is a point for every human where additional training hours start to negatively impact your performance. To my understanding, recent research actually suggests elite athletes should sleep a couple of hours per night more than most people, so in some way a key piece of "doing anything to win" involves scheduling time to do nothing at all.
- benreesman 4y agoThe absence of a strict metric yielding a total ordering (if you want to get all math pissy about it) over all people who write code does not in fact create any confusion about where Carmack or Dean sit relative to the average shmuck (e.g. me) who knows what a branch table buffer is and knows what it is on Golden Cove and Xen 3, and the fucking JavaScript-only people. I hate that knowing your craft and not being embarrassed about it is a faux pas around here. When did people who haven’t put in the time become a protected class? It’s not borderline racist to know why Electron apps suck ass in excruciating detail.