>So the author argues not to avoid cruelty because it only reduces cruelty by 99.9932%. This is garbage. Where is this argued at all? It does include this bit:

>So the author argues not to avoid cruelty because it only reduces cruelty by 99.9932%. This is garbage. Where is this argued at all? It does include this bit: >This isn’t a call to forks for you to head to your nearest all-you-can-eat­ ­steakhouse. Buxton would like to see everyone reduce consumption of meat from industrial farming and ­transition towards more sustainably raised meat, “which will likely mean consuming less”. It seems like the purpose of the article is to point out that veganism is not a magic solution, despite it being advertised that way. But nowhere does it claim that we should "not avoid cruelty".