3 ms·
I don't see _how_ Apple missed multiple external displays with the m2. Not even worth purchasing.
by exabrial 4y ago
I don't see _how_ Apple missed multiple external displays with the m2. Not even worth purchasing.
- dbbk 4y agoBecause the vast majority of laptop users don’t use multiple displays. If you need that, go to the Pro chips.
- exabrial 4y agoThey too, don't allow for multiple external displays.
- tpmoney 4y agoHow do you figure? I have a 16 inch MBP right here running two external displays and the internal and none are mirrored displays
- exabrial 4y agoThats an _intel_ mac. Or are you on the M1 super duper max everything?
- chuckhendo 4y agoThe M1 Macbook Pros (not the 13") support up to 2 external displays for the M1 Pro and up to 4 for the M1 Max
- tpmoney 4y agoM1 Pro. But so you don’t have to take my word for it, here are apples own tech specs https://www.apple.com/macbook-pro-14-and-16/specs/ https://www.apple.com/macbook-pro-14-and-16/specs/ Scroll down to “Display Support”
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- goosedragons 4y agoWhich would be fair at like $500. But at $1000+ it's a bit ridiculous when basically every PC laptop in the price range and even Apple's own prior Intel MBAs could do 2+ external displays. It's not like you really need insane levels of CPU/GPU to show a word processor on one monitor and a web browser on the other.
- ivantop 4y agoThey absolutely didn't miss it -- it was definitely a conscious decision to prevent "pro" users from buying a cheaper MacBook Air and instead get them to purchase the more expensive 14/16" M2 MacBook Pro (whenever it comes out).